Monday, December 31, 2012

Gandhi was Pro 2nd Amendment

Welcome to The Calm Canary Blog!  It's time to talk about gun control!

CTRL+click to listen in a new tab:

"Canary in a Coalmine" - The Police

For an in-depth analysis of this song, [see post ""Canary in a Coalmine"101"].

"The guns going is the canary in the coalmine."

- Alex Jones


(typo: it should read: "...the Act of depriving a whole nation of arms...")

Is it possible to be anti-gun, yet very *well-armed 


And contrary to popular belief, you don't have to be pro-violence to be pro-gun.  Gandhi was pro-gun.  Peace-loving people (like Gandhi, like myself) who are at least vaguely acquainted with "history as we know it" tend to support the 2nd Amendment - not because it has anything to do with hunting, but because an armed citizenry is the best defense against a rogue, totalitarian government (which is precisely what we are facing).

If you think it would be better to let a rogue government take over entirely than to suffer the casualties that might happen as a result of raising a defense against it or overthrowing it, then you might support gun control.

But if you think that way, then I think you've been exposed to so much fluoride, mercury, and aluminum that you are unable to recognize tyranny when it is staring you in the face.  [see post "SynerTox," see post "The Tao of Eeyore (Ore-Eye)"]  If you think it would be better to sacrifice the last remaining vestiges of the Constitution for whatever number of human lives might be saved momentarily by confiscating guns, then I think you are like an abused child that can not even admit to itself that it is abused - and indeed that is how I would characterize the relationship between the people of the Earth and the shadow government that is consummating the New World Order.  The abused children of the Earth must wake up and realize that they are slaves now so that they can be freed immediately!

In my minds eye I see the children cowering in a corner, holding their knees to their chests, muttering,

"Is it okay for me to protect myself?  What will everyone think?  Is it okay to own a gun?  Is it okay to learn primitive skills/wilderness survival/tracking/nature observation?  Is that politically incorrect?"

Maybe you've forgotten how to get angry as a physiological reaction to tyranny.  Remember your original nature!  What is it?  (I'll give you a hint: the answer doesn't include hatefulness, fear, powerlessness, or unconsciousness...)

There are numerous philosophical arguments against gun ownership- "Live by the sword, ..." and so on.  Some might say it is a fearful practice to own a gun, or that it might invite trouble into your life by giving you bad karma or something like that.  But "Like attracts like," is one of my favorite quotes (Richard Bach) for this occasion.  Anti-gun folks might think that it is the perfect quote for their case - that guns will attract more guns - but this is a fallacy.  Blaming guns for violence is like blaming spoons for fat people.  And so I will take the Richard Bach quote, in this instance, to mean that like people will attract each other, and that the sort of people that arm themselves to the hilt with information and arm themselves a little bit with weapons as a reasonable, practical preventative measure will tend to attract like-minded and like-hearted people into their lives.  It was not until I realized that it actually is a rogue government we are facing that I became a strong supporter of the 2nd Amendment.  So I hereby (sarcastically) "thank" the evil New World Order for presenting the vile external threat that was necessary for me to wake up to, learn about, and eventually come to resist, in order to shape up my way of thinking about gun control.  If our dark side is manifesting itself so plainly in other people - and if 'the cockroaches' think it is acceptable now to parade around in broad daylight - then we aren't embracing it fully. 

Back to the topic.  Again, the 2nd Amendment is not about hunting - it is about protecting a population from a rogue government - and so it does not make sense to restrict certain types of firearms with the stated goal of reducing violence.  I emphatically say "stated goal" because it seems more often the rule than the exception today that policies have actual goals that are quite different from the goals that are stated.  If we freeze the weapons technology of our militia at 1934 levels while the rogue government that they are resisting has nuclear weapons, Star Wars technology, the scourge that is the surveillance state, control of the water supply and what is added to it (!), control of the electrical grid, control of the weather, seed banks and underground bunkers, mind control technology and much more (your imagination is the only limit) at their disposal, then we are asking for history to repeat itself.  The people that are in power had no scruples about orchestrating 9/11, ..., ..., and I don't think they would have scruples about rounding us up, putting us in camps, and killing 80, 90, or even more than 99% of us and force-vaccinating the rest in order to create a new society that is to their liking.

For information about FEMA camps, please [see post ""The children are probably very happy""].

For information about compulsory vaccination, the anti-vaccine surveillance and alert system, behavior-modifying live virus vaccines and GMO banana vaccines, [see post ""Eat the banana or we have to put you down!""].

CTRL+click to watch videos in a new tab!

"Gandhi was Pro 2nd Amendment" - David Knight of InfoWars

"Facebook Banning Gun Owners En Masse" - Alex Jones of InfoWars

"Well, you know, I've thought about it, and not one single one of these mass shootings has ever occurred where guns are allowed."

 - Suzanna Hupp, mass shooting survivor

(watch her interview with Alex Jones right here)


*Dianne Feinstein is a perfect example of this strange hybrid personality type (she's a well-armed gun grabber).  There must be a lot of conscious conflict in that head of hers.  It must be confusing to be a well-armed gun grabber.  I know I'm scratching my head - it's tingling like crazy!  If you think that it makes sense for the elites to be able to own guns while the rest of us lose our 2nd Amendment rights, I think you must be as fragmented as Dianne and just not realize it.  Criminals always have guns 
For more information about gun control, and for some great videos from Alex Jones, [see post "Alex Jones IS Admiral Ackbar"].

[under construction; subject to update]


Sunday, December 30, 2012

Nation of Change?


Saturday, December 29, 2012

Michio Kaku video compilation

The following videos (most of which can be found scattered around this blog) demonstrate the fact that Michio Kaku is no longer the independent physicist he once was, and has become what even the gentlest soul would call a "whore to the mainstream media".  I wanted to bring them together in one place because it occurred to me that there are still plenty of informed people that don't know Michio Kaku is not in his integrity. 

[under construction]



Every four-year-old child knows in their gut that the American people did not get the truth about the terrorist attacks of 9/11, but most people have been adrift in the sea of misinformation and disinformation that surrounds the subject and unable to prove it both to themselves and to others with logical, left-brained, linear approaches. 

If you aren't sure that the official story of 9/11 was a lie, drift no more: the documentary that I recommend to everyone is "Blueprint for Truth" by Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth.

watch here:

Since his area of research and interest is in the actual event and the physical evidence created by that event (and also in order to keep from narrowing his audience), Richard Gage of AE911Truth does not necessarily contend that the attacks were an "inside job."  I do.  As Jesse Ventura says, "EVERY war starts with a false flag operation."  The Gulf of Tonkin was a lie. 

9/11 was a sort of re-run of Hitler burning down the Reichstag. 


Wednesday, December 12, 2012

Linus Pauling practiced urine therapy!

[under construction]

Linus Pauling, who coined the term "orthomolecular medicine," was criticized by some for promoting vitamin C supplementation.  In my book, of course, this is inane - one might as well attack a doctor for giving their patients vitamin B12 shots (it would make as much sense).  

While the idea of drinking urine is unappealing to me, I recently learned that Linus Pauling used urine therapy to try to stop his cancer.  The guy who interprets my dreams has told me repeatedly that I am a lot like Linus Pauling, so learning this turned out to be a fascinating synchronicity.  Some people say that if Pauling had started UT earlier he could have cured himself.  Perhaps so.  

There is an inappropriate joke yet to be made here about his name being Linus...


CTRL+click to watch videos in a new tab!

"Urine Therapy (You're in good health)"

"Linus Pauling used urine therapy..."

     (this video contains very little discussion on Linus Pauling's use of urine therapy, but is very interesting for other reasons)
"Friend of Linus Pauling" 


For more information about urine therapy, distilled liquids and Alchemy, see post ["Water Of Love"].


A fascinating video of Linus Pauling talking about vitamin C, collagen, heart disease and more may be found here:  

Unfortunately the video cuts out after some time and the audio is all that remains.  And even that is a small segment of the original clip, available on Veoh with the installed web player. 

I will try to find a source for the original full-length video that does not require installing a player.

Vitamin C may turn out to be especially critical for my own individual health because I have problems with my connective tissue - hypermobile joints - and problems with my blood vessels - daily migraines and some circulation problems (cold hands and feet).  Perhaps both are related to a collagen problem, and perhaps this can be improved by boosting my vit. C intake.


Sunday, December 2, 2012

DK Ultra

[under construction]


Oncogenes are genes known to "cause" cancer.  Oncomemes are ideas, thoughts, feelings, videos, music, writing, or other malignant vehicles that lead to degradation of human psyche, relationships or culture.

Many of you may be familiar with "Somebody That I Used To Know" by Gotye.  I contend that this song and music video contains oncomemes designed to degrade human relationships!  If you aren't familiar, you can watch the video here:

(be sure to have your innate B.S. Detector booted up before you watch this; it requires discernment)

Bill Lamb of gave the song the perfect rating of five stars, stating,  

"Pop perfection does not come along often, but Gotye's 'Somebody That I Used to Know' is flawless".

Talking about the overwhelming reception and the amount of coverage received, Gotye commented that,  

"I don't really feel like it [the song] belongs to me anymore."

While I agree that it is very catchy - even "pop perfection" - I don't necessarily think that is a good thing.  It is also now one of the most popular songs ever, but I don't think that's a good thing, either.  I think the song contains "oncomemes" designed and inserted to degrade human relationships in those that listen unconsciously and do not recognize this treachery.  I think that Gotye and Kimbra act like egotistical narcissists in the song, singing things like, "you didn't have to cut me off" "you didn't have to stoop so low" "you screwed me over".  Boo-hoo!  Come on people, use your inner BS detectors, listen to your guts and be discerning!  The level of evolution of the inner marriage and the level of evolution of a romantic relationship go hand in hand, and this song is designed to spread like a virus and prevent the evolution of consciousness and relationships beyond petty egoic narcissism.  I'm surprised the video didn't have any lyrics about "how you hurt my pride" or some other nonsense.

Three people in my "soul group" - the ones that feel weirdest about talking to me/seem to be most afraid of speaking with me directly and some of the most spiritually inclined people in my circle of friends - recommended the song within a span of two weeks.  Kenan sent an email to me back then saying that the music video reminded him of me, and at the same time that he sent the email, he sent me a text message saying, "Hey, I sent you an email with a music video.  You may wish to shout the chorus someday."  (this is paraphrased, not exact...Kenan, if you remember the exact wording feel free to correct me in a comment below)  I thought this was peculiar.  But I later decided that Kenan was planting something malicious when he sent that video - it was almost like he was trying to speak spells over me.

After all, he is the only guy I know who says he doesn't take song recommendations from anyone, ever.

Fortunately, I was sensitive enough to notice the deceptive nature of the song relatively quickly, so I think within a few days I texted Kenan back: "Rupert Murdoch was probably busy drinking babies' blood in the Outback when he stumbled upon Gotye and decided to make a new star."  You don't have to take that literally, but you could.

Update 3/31/2013:  At the time that I sent that message, I didn't realize that Murdoch actually lives in Australia, and possibly was drinking babies' blood, since this is apparently a common practice amongst the elite.  Why would I make the sweeping allegation that many elites drink blood?  Because distilled waters are the secret of Alchemy, and blood is one of the distilled waters.  This explains such stories as vampire legends.  But blood is not only drunk by people in this secret society, no.  You thought they took it far enough by drinking blood but they've already taken it to the next level - blood baths.  Gross.  See Alchemy: The Medieval Alchemists and their Royal Art by Johannes Fabricius for old illustrations of children being killed and their blood being drained into buckets so that 'Sol' and 'Luna' - a man and woman with a sun and a moon for their heads, respectively - can bathe in a well full of this blood.  I suppose the blood of children is cleaner than that of adults, having not built up a lot of toxicity.  But there is also an energetic reason for using the blood of children - the same reason why children are used for Satanic ritual abuse through anal rape: the age is important.  David Icke has already talked about this at great length.  In their own way, Matt Stone and Trey Parker have explained it in South Park S10E01: "The Return of Chef," in which Chef has become one of the brainwashed child abusers who are members of the Super Adventure Club, which travels the world seeking exotic places to rape children.  The age is important (children vs. adult victims) because these "entities"* or perhaps the abusers themselves feed on the energy of children and think it will make them immortal, or some variation on that concept.

*(David Icke claims entities attached to the abuser feed on the energy of children)

[under construction]