Sunday, July 1, 2012

Scientific American says, "Geoengineering Could Turn Skies White"

Simon says...


Geoengineering Could Turn Skies White

Efforts to reflect away the sun's rays might also make the sky whiter, one of many reasons some distrust such geoengineering schemes



Personally I distrust geoengineering schemes because they are SECRET!

Read here!

Scientific American, June 2012 - "Geoengineering Could Turn Skies White," by Lauren Morello.
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=geoengineering-could-turn-skies-white
 


Scientific American, June 2012


"The white haze that hangs over many major cities could become a familiar sight everywhere if the world decides to try geoengineering to create a cooler planet."

I interpret this as an admission of present-day "geoengineering""testing" programs, because 'hangs' in 'the white haze that hangs over many major cities' is in present tense

"Some people might not notice. Others might not care. But even folks who can't tell a picture-postcard blue sky from its milky, geoengineered cousin might be able to detect other side effects of using sulfate to cool the planet."

Are you a scientific American?  Can you tell a picture-postcard blue sky from its milky, geoengineered cousin?


"If you look across the survey, one big challenge for anyone who's proposing geoengineering methods is how to even begin to explain this to the general public, and then begin to make this credible,"

- Barry Rabe, a professor at the University of Michigan's Gerald Ford School of Public Policy.

The article itself is PR.  If you haven't heard of PR, you've got a lot of history to catch up on!  To learn about Eddie Bernays, the nephew of Sigmund Freud and father of modern PR, please watch "The Century of The Self, Part 4":

http://vimeo.com/20876519

[NOTE: the reason I recommend that you watch only Part 4 of The Century of The Self is that parts 1-3 are almost identical in content, and all four parts restate the same things over and over again.  Maybe BBC/Adam Curtis was trying to drive home a point. ]

"...few respondents indicated they were neutral about geoengineering."



"I frankly expected more people to punt on this one."  - Barry Rabe



My fellow investigators, I strongly discourage neutrality.  Be free radicals!

In conclusion, Scientific American says:

"Geoengineering Could Turn Skies White"

The Calm Canary says:

A secret spray program is turning our skies white, and it is presented to the public as a geoengineering program.  As Michael Murphy often repeats, "the stated goal is geoengineering." 

[For links to his films, see post "Why in the World Are They Spraying? (Full Length Documentary HD"]

This article mentions only injecting sulfates into the stratosphere.  That is misleading, and intentionally so.  Many other more toxic substances are being sprayed and have been sprayed for a long time (alumina, barium oxide, strontium oxide...).

There is a long history of aerosols being sprayed from planes.

[see post "Cold War ZnCdS spraying over USA and UK"]

The military industrial complex has the desire to be able to spray anything it wants on anybody at any time anywhere in the world for any reason.  It is all about ruthless control.  "Geoengineering Could Turn Skies White" is perhaps the beginning of chemtrail disclosure - it is a PR ploy to make chemtrails seem normative. 

IF chemtrails are a geoengineering experiment - which I doubt - they are actually more of a social engineering experiment.  The point is not to turn the temperature dial, but to get people used to seeing lines in the sky that go from horizon to horizon, dotted lines in the sky, and chemclouds that expand to turn the sky white. 
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No comments: